Professional academic writing service

Experts provide help with assignments of all academic levels and disciplines.

895 reviews
577 reviews
321 reviews
Estimate your price
Word count
~255 words $10
100% Plagiarism-Free Essays. Any Topic or Difficulty can be handled!


Recommendations for Growth1. Stop the dollar special for each week: 1st step is to stop the dollar special promotion immediately. This ...


The internet is no man’s land. The whole world has been melted into a global village as the Internet pervades the homes, offices and even phones...

Cyber Security,Internet Security,Technology,

People eat fast food when they do not have enough time to manage themselves a great scrumptious meal due to busy work or research study. Junk fo...

China,Culture,Fast Food,Food,Happiness,Socrates,

What are the basic facts?Merck & Co. Inc. is one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies in the world for producers of prescrip...

Business,Economy,Pharmaceutical Industry,Trust,

Many theories and assumptions have been fabricated upon the basis of man’s desires and beliefs. H. L. Mencken wrote, “The average man does not w...

Freedom,Liberty,Patrick Henry,Security,

Leisure time may not come very frequently for students and should therefore be used wisely. Students should value this time as taking time out f...


Answer the following questions regarding simple machine systems. Each question requires proper illustration and annotation, including labeling o...


Nancy Mairs’ searched for months for something on television or in the media that represented women like her. When I say “women like her”, this ...


Beyonce Giselle Knowles-Carter, or much better referred to as Beyonce, is an American singer-songwriter and actress. Beyonce would be thought ab...


The major irony in Of Mice and Men is that George kills Lennie because of their friendship. George kills Lennie to spare him from a worse death....

Irony,Of Mice And Men,

“Access the efficiency of the criminal justice system in dealing with young wrongdoers” The criminal justice system’s goals to be reliable in ha...

Criminal Justice,Criminal Justice System,

Although, Chris’s father Walt McCandless and Ronald Franz spent a lot of time with him, both offered him different level of support. Walt McCand...

Into The Wild,

From a cursory search on “defensive driving” via Google, it became obvious to me that defensive driving courses are highly in demand and a huge ...


Using information from the items and elsewhere, examine the reasons for changing patterns of marriage, cohabitation and childbearing in the last...

Divorce,Family,Human Nature,Marriage,

Cooper Industries was organized in 1919 as a manufacturer of heavy machinery and equipment. By the mid-1950s it was a leading producer of engine...


Whole Foods Market, Inc. which is headquartered in Austin, Texas, is an American foods supermarket chain it was founded by John Mackey who curre...


1. Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn are best friends that have many things in common and many things that are not in common. Tom is better at using his ...

Huck Finn,
Lohri Festival
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

In Punjab the life is lead in a different style. A tradition of living life with fun and gaiety, enjoying very moment, can be seen here. Glimpse...


Carl Robins, a junior recruiter for ABC, Inc, with only a limited amount of experience, commendably retained 15 new employees in April. The newe...

Case Study,Employment,Recruitment,

In the story In Another Country, one of Hemingway’s greatest themes is the implausibility of war, focusing on the fate of the soldiers in the af...


The weaknesses of the Ontological argument give support to Atheism. Discuss this statement

Anselm’s ontological argument described in part (a), was refuted in his own lifetime, by Gaunilo, who demonstrated in a reduction ad absurdum of his own, that if the logic of the argument were applied to things other than God, it led to invalid conclusions. Gaunilo didn’t identify any specific fault with the argument, but argued that something must be wrong with it, because if there wasn’t anything wrong, then we can use its logic to prove anything, which we may have no reason to believe to be true.

For instance, Gaunilo argued that it’s possible to construct an argument in the exact same form as the ontological argument, that claims to prove the existence of the perfect island: this island must exist for if it did not then it would be possible to conceive of an island greater than that island than which no greater can be conceived, which is absurd. Therefore, if the ontological argument works, then the argument for the existence of the perfect island must work too.

This weakness of the ontological argument adds fuel to the fire for atheists through Gaunilo putting forward his argument for the existence of the perfect island as an objection to the ontological argument. He knew that they would both fall, which shows that neither argument works which further supports atheists.

Another weakness of the ontological argument which gives support to atheists is Immanuel Kant’s objection to it: Existence is not a Predicate. Fundamental to both Anselm’s and Descartes’ form of the ontological argument is that existence is a predicate, an attribute or a quality that can be possessed or lacked. These qualities for example, may or may not belong to a thing or being and their presence or absence is part of our understanding and apprehension of it. Kant observed however, that existence isn’t associated with the definition of something, since it didn’t add to our understanding of that thing.

This supports atheism as existence is merely something that we can have or not have, and it is absurd to say what something is like without it existing. It also supports atheism as an atheist would say that we can’t ascribe existence a priori to a definition of a perfect being.

Bertrand Russell furthered Kant’s observations, proposing that ‘existence’ was not a predicate, but a term used to solely indicate the instance of something in the ‘spatio temporal’ world. To say something exists only tells us that that thing occupies a space on the earth. For example saying ‘Cows are brown, and exist’ tells us only one thing: they are brown. The ‘and exist’ shows that they are on the earth, however it’s a tautology since to say they are brown, effectively suggests that they exist and aren’t imaginary.

Thomas Aquinas had already questioned this aspect of the ontological argument, claiming that Anselm was guilty of making ‘transitional error’ – moving from the definition of God to the existence of Him. He observed that Anselm also was guilty of making an assumption about the definition of God that was not necessarily shared by all believers. This supports atheism because not all believers believed in Anselm’s definition of God, which poses the question, if people have different views on the right or wrong definition of God, what’s to say that they could ALL be wrong, and atheism is the truth in it all? Furthermore, Aquinas said that understanding the term ‘God’ means that God exists in the understanding, not in reality.

God’s existence in reality must be demonstrated a posteriori, with evidence or experience. Atheism is supported in this way, as atheists could argue that anyone can believe what they like in their minds, but something has to be evident in material form in reality to be actually real. Overall, the weaknesses generally give support to atheism as they show alternatives and flaws in the ontological argument. The ways in which atheists interpret the critic’s objections leads to further belief that God does not exist. Atheists are supported primarily by the fact that the ontological argument is a priori, so does not rely on empirical evidence, therefore if there was empirical evidence for God’s existence, they might be swayed slightly in their beliefs.

Date: Oct 12,2021